swapping struts for firmer suspension

BuickLesabre98

New member
Joined
Sep 5, 2020
Messages
20
Reaction score
2
Points
3
Buick Ownership
Lesabre
ok, i got a good one today. I know the unlimited knowledge of the Buick family can help me out! got a 98 LeSabre. Id like to stiffen up the suspension. IE struts. i have new replacements, but was wondering if i could swap out the strut and spring from a police/taxi impala and just use the Buick upper strut mount!? the rear shock was going to replace with an air strut, no big deal. i know the Buick is supposed to be a softer ride and all but harsh roads out here wear out the struts quick. any and all input/info is greatly appreciated.
 
ok, i got a good one today. I know the unlimited knowledge of the Buick family can help me out! got a 98 LeSabre. Id like to stiffen up the suspension. IE struts. i have new replacements, but was wondering if i could swap out the strut and spring from a police/taxi impala and just use the Buick upper strut mount!? the rear shock was going to replace with an air strut, no big deal. i know the Buick is supposed to be a softer ride and all but harsh roads out here wear out the struts quick. any and all input/info is greatly appreciated.
The 1996 Impala is related to the Road Master and the 2000 Impala is related to the Regal. So what Impala do you think uses the same parts as a LeSabre and where are you going to find a new strut from that time period that is heavy duty?
 
Heavier springs hold heavier loads. If the car itself is not holding more weight than usual, consider keeping the springs you have or maybe a small adjustment to level the body.

Then go for different shocks, some of which can be adjusted for absorbing the bump, rebound after the bump, or both.
 
If you're driving on rough roads, a soft suspension, within reason, is what you want. (Not soft as in worn out, I just mean a factory buick setup in good condition) I've owned a few vehicles I've modified the suspensions on. 2 motor swapped accords, one with ground control coilovers and revalved bilsteins, and the other one on Tein coilovers with matching struts, with adjustable valving. Both of those hondas were completely undriveable on gravel roads. The first one didn't even smooth out on pavement until above 80 mph. Race car stuff sucks on the street. I also had a 2011 vw golf, weirdly, that thing rode like the hondas, despite being 100% stock. Bumps in the road felt like kidney punches. The other vehicle I modified (to a moronic degree) is my 95 silverado. The gas motor came out in favor of a 96 12 valve. I swapped a dana 60 in the front of that, cutting out the independent front suspension. Despite the high unsprung weight of the solid axles, because of the tire diameter, that would roll right over any smaller bumps like ripples on gravel at any speed. (37" inch cooper stt pro mud tires.) But that unsprung weight would reveal itself hitting larger bumps, giving you a strong message to slow down.

I'm just saying from my experience, if you're driving on rough roads, you don't want stiffer springs and more damping. At least not more high speed damping. Low speed damping would be good for body control with soft springs. I suppose it's possible the struts would last longer because they wouldn't move as much, but they would shake and rattle the car apart, and put more force on other suspension components, wearing them out more quickly.

I guess one exception to this would be if you could dial in a little more rebound damping if you're driving on roads with potholes. More rebound damping would prevent the tire from falling down as far into the pothole as you drive over it, dramatically reducing the impact. But that same damping, if you're going around a curve with ripples or bumps, can cause the suspension to "pack", or compress, and the car will skip over the bumps, causing you to slide outward in the turn if you're pushing it hard enough. There's a Lot of engineering that goes into suspension design.
 
Last edited:
______________________________

Help support this site so it can continue supporting you!
After owning both a few Buicks and other "Land Yachts" in my years, I can honestly say that Buick did a great job balancing ride quality and handling on their LeSabre vehicles. Really, that's what I enjoy about them - It's their ability to soak-up bumps and provide a very comfortable ride.

Handling isn't all that bad and I find my 2001 very responsive considering the weight and dimensions of the car. I can understand the OP's desire to "firm things up" but would advise him that it's more important to keep the OEM suspension in great tip-top shape vs. altering spring / shock rates.

Buick had dozens of engineers working on a balance for these cars... I can't really see how altering the suspension would benefit you at this point.

I also drove a '94 Miata for 16 years with all sorts of suspension mods. Great car an ton of fun. But a Buick "anything" will never be a Miata....

And that's what I love about mine. It's made for cruising and road trips. Hope this helps!
 
Impala is a different animal... Look for the KYB sport -plus line for loaded struts for front and rear. Also replace all your stabilizer bushings with polyurethane ones. I assume all your control arm bushings, arms, ball joints and tie rod ends are in great shape. This all will help get you what you want without a harsh ride.
 
True to a point. But a 3500lb car will hide most of it. Biggest issue with them is squeaking and make sure you use the provide lube that come with them.
 
Back
Top